Home
Quality of Life in New Zealand's large urban areas.
About the Project
Quality of Life Indicators
Links
Contacts
Site Map
Section 2 - Quality of Life
   You are here:
Home
Residents' Surveys
2003 Report
People
Knowledge and Skills
Standard of Living
Economic Development
Housing
Health
Natural Environment
Built Environment
Safety
Social Connectedness
Civil and Political Rights
2001 Report
 » Advanced search
Print Key Results
Email a Friend

To view and print pdf files on this site, you will need Acrobat Reader. This is free for download from the
Adobe website.


Note: If you need to copy content from the pdfs, choose the full report or entire sections for suitable format.


Background & Research Design
Section 1: Quality of Life
Section 2: Health and Lifestyle (6 pages)
Section 3: Community Cohesion (2 pages)
Section 4: Safety
Section 5: Urban Environment (2 pages)
Section 6: Democracy (2 pages)
Section 7: Information Technology (2 pages)
Sample Sizes and Contact Analysis
Survey Questionnaire 274 KB pdf
Full Survey Report (large file) 1.2 MB pdf


Overall Health



Most residents in New Zealand’s eight largest cities rated their health as good or extremely good (86%).

Christchurch City residents were more likely to rate their health as poor or extremely poor (6%), in comparison to other cities.


Younger residents (18-25) were less likely to describe their health as extremely good than other age groups, as were Asian/Indian residents.


Females were more likely to rate their overall health as extremely good than males.

More than one third of residents with an annual income of over $70,001 rated their quality of life as extremely good.

In contrast, households with an annual income of less than $20,000 were significantly less likely to rate their quality of life positively.







As is evident with health ratings, the majority of residents in New Zealand’s eight largest cities rated their lifestyle as healthy or very healthy (78%).

These ratings were similar amongst residents of all cities.


Those residents aged 18 to 25 years were less likely to rate their lifestyle as healthy (72%), compared with other age groups.

This was particularly significant in those aged 65 years and over, where 91% rated their lifestyle as healthy.


Females were significantly more likely than males to rate their lifestyle as extremely healthy (22% versus 16% respectively).

Households with an annual income of under $20,000 were the most likely of all income groups to report an unhealthy lifestyle (8%).

  Page Last Updated: 24 Feb 2004
Top ^    

| Home | About the Project | Key Indicators | Definitions | Data Collection | Conclusions | Links | Contact | People |
| Knowledge and Skills | Standard of Living | Economic Development | Housing | Health | Natural Environment |
| Built Environment |Safety |Social Connectedness | Civil and Political Rights |