Home
Quality of Life in New Zealand's large urban areas.
About the Project
Quality of Life Indicators
Links
Contacts
Site Map
Section 4 - Quality of Life
   You are here:
Home
Residents' Surveys
2003 Report
People
Knowledge and Skills
Standard of Living
Economic Development
Housing
Health
Natural Environment
Built Environment
Safety
Social Connectedness
Civil and Political Rights
2001 Report
 » Advanced search
Print Key Results
Email a Friend

To view and print pdf files on this site, you will need Acrobat Reader. This is free for download from the
Adobe website.


Note: If you need to copy content from the pdfs, choose the full report or entire sections for suitable format.


Background & Research Design
Section 1: Quality of Life
Section 2: Health and Lifestyle (6 pages)
Section 3: Community Cohesion (2 pages)
Section 4: Safety
Section 5: Urban Environment (2 pages)
Section 6: Democracy (2 pages)
Section 7: Information Technology (2 pages)
Sample Sizes and Contact Analysis
Survey Questionnaire 274KB pdf
Full Survey Report (large file) 1.2 MB pdf


Freedom from Crime

The chart below shows how residents of New Zealand’s eight largest cities rate safety in different locations.




The vast majority of residents felt safe during the daytime in all locations.

After dark however, residents’ sense of safety declined in all situations, with over one third (36%) feeling unsafe in their city centre after dark.

The tables below show the percentage of residents who felt unsafe/very unsafe in different locations\ and situations - by city, gender and ethnicity.

Situation
Eight Cities (n=4,000)
North Shore (n=500)
Waitak (n=500)
Auck (n=500)
Manuk (n=500)
Ham (n=500)
Wgtn (n=500)
ChCh (n=500)
Ddn (n=500)
                 
At home
2
2
4
4
3
-
1
-
1
Local Neighbourhood
2
1
3
3
3
1
1
-
1
City Centre
4
2
4
6
6
2
2
4
1
                 
At home
6
4
8
10
10
7
3
4
3
Local Neighbourhood
16
8
20
20
24
20
9
14
10
City Centre
36
23
36
39
48
37
23
42
26

All residents felt relatively safe in every daytime situation. After dark however, residents of Auckland City and Manukau City were more likely to feel unsafe in their home and local neighbourhood. In the city centre, residents of both Manukau City and Christchurch City were significantly more likely to feel unsafe.

Situation
Eight Cities (n=4,000)
Male (n=1,667)
Female (n=2,333)
European (n=2,954)
Maori (n=348)
Pacific Islands (n=206)
Asian/ Indian (n=358)
             
At home
2
2
2
2
1
4
5
Local Neighbourhood
2
2
2
1
1
7
3
City Centre
4
3
5
3
5
8
5
             
At home
6
6
7
5
9
16
9
Local Neighbourhood
16
9
23
16
18
22
13
City Centre
36
27
44
37
34
30
33

Again, all groups felt relatively safe in all daytime situations. However, Asian/Indian residents were more likely to feel unsafe during the day at home, while Pacific Island residents were more likely to feel unsafe during the day in their local neighbourhood and city centre.

After dark, females were far less likely to feel safe outside of their home than males.


Safety for Children

Residents were asked to consider the safety of the local neighbourhood for the unsupervised play of children.



Just over one quarter (26%) of all residents felt it was unsafe for children to play unsupervised in their local neighbourhood.

This was significantly higher in Waitakere/Auckland and Manukau cities, where 30% and 33% respectively felt the neighbourhood was unsafe for children to play in unsupervised.

In contrast, residents of Dunedin and North Shore cities were less likely to feel the neighbourhood was unsafe.

 


Compared with other ethnic groups, residents of Maori and Pacific Island ethnicity were far more likely to feel that their local neighbourhood was unsafe for children to play in unsupervised.

 

Females were more likely to feel the neighbourhood was unsafe for children to play in unsupervised than males (30% versus 23% respectively).

Residents who felt that their local neighbourhood was unsafe or very unsafe for unsupervised play of children were asked their reasons why.

 


The two main reasons residents felt their local neighbourhood was unsafe for children to play in unsupervised were because of stranger danger (50%) and traffic risks (42%).


  Page Last Updated: 24 Feb 2004
Top ^    

| Home | About the Project | Key Indicators | Definitions | Data Collection | Conclusions | Links | Contact | People |
| Knowledge and Skills | Standard of Living | Economic Development | Housing | Health | Natural Environment |
| Built Environment |Safety |Social Connectedness | Civil and Political Rights |