Home
Quality of Life in New Zealand's large urban areas.
About the Project
Quality of Life Indicators
Links
Contacts
Site Map
Section 5 - Quality of Life
   You are here:
Home
Residents' Surveys
2003 Report
People
Knowledge and Skills
Standard of Living
Economic Development
Housing
Health
Natural Environment
Built Environment
Safety
Social Connectedness
Civil and Political Rights
2001 Report
 » Advanced search
Print Key Results
Email a Friend

To view and print pdf files on this site, you will need Acrobat Reader. This is free for download from the
Adobe website.


Note: If you need to copy content from the pdfs, choose the full report or entire sections for suitable format.


Background & Research Design
Section 1: Quality of Life
Section 2: Health and Lifestyle ( 6 pages)
Section 3: Community Cohesion ( 2 pages)
Section 4: Safety
Section 5: Urban Environment ( 2 pages)
Section 6: Democracy ( 2 pages)
Section 7: Information Technology (2 pages)
Sample Sizes and Contact Analysis
Survey Questionnaire 274 KB pdf
Full Survey Report (large file) 1.2 MB pdf


Urban Environment Issues

The charts below indicate the degree to which residents of New Zealand’s eight largest cities felt different issues were a problem in their local neighbourhood.




Graffiti, car theft and damage, dangerous driving and traffic risks were perceived as problems by 60% or more of residents in New Zealand’s eight largest cities.

Broken windows, unsafe people and air/noise pollution were seen as less of a problem than the other issues listed.
The tables below show the percentage of residents who felt that various urban environment issues were a problem or big problem - by city, gender and ethnicity.

 
Eight Cities (n=4,000)
North Shore (n=500)
Waitak (n=500)
Auck (n=500)
Manuk (n=500)
Ham (n=500)
Wgtn (n=500)
ChCh (n=500)
Ddn (n=500)
Rubbish/litter
26
14
19
35
38
23
20
23
21
Graffiti
41
21
42
54
62
36
17
45
11
Broken windows
22
11
17
28
34
18
10
25
12
Car theft/damage
49
26
36
66
62
52
34
48
40
Dangerous driving
58
39
49
69
75
55
38
63
46
Traffic risks
38
27
31
48
41
33
32
40
34
Unsafe people
17
8
16
19
27
17
11
18
8
Air pollution
28
12
21
40
29
11
7
52
8
Water pollution
34
51
24
45
41
32
18
26
20
Noise pollution
20
14
16
31
34
18
12
13
8

Residents of Auckland City and Manukau City were significantly more concerned with most of these issues. On the other hand, residents of Dunedin, Wellington and North Shore cities were more likely to feel that the majority of these issues were not a problem in their community.
 
Eight Cities (n=4,000)
Male (n=1,667)
Female (n=2,333)
European (n=2,954)
Maori (n=348)
Pacific Islands (n=206)
Asian/ Indian (n=358)
Rubbish/litter
26
22
30
24
34
47
21
Graffiti
41
40
41
39
52
57
29
Broken windows
22
22
22
18
25
47
24
Car theft/damage
49
48
50
48
53
65
42
Dangerous driving
58
56
60
57
64
75
55
Traffic risks
38
35
40
39
36
46
31
Unsafe people
17
15
18
22
30
20
12
Air pollution
28
26
31
27
35
42
24
Water pollution
34
30
37
33
47
48
18
Noise pollution
20
19
22
18
29
34
19

Residents of Pacific Island ethnicity were significantly more concerned with all of the above issues. This is in contrast to residents of Asian/Indian ethnicity in particular, where the majority of these issues were seen as less of a problem.

Females were more likely to perceive rubbish/litter, dangerous driving, traffic risks and air and water pollution as problems than males.




The charts below show the degree to which residents of New Zealand’s eight largest cities agree with the statement ‘I feel a sense of pride in the way my city looks and feels’




Seventy two percent of all residents felt a sense of pride in their city’s look and feel, while 9% did not.

City pride was stronger in Wellington, Christchurch and Dunedin cities.

On the other hand, the largest proportion of residents who disagreed with having a sense of pride in their city lived in Manukau City, where 22% disagreed with this statement.

 


While residents of Maori ethnicity were less likely to have a sense of pride in the look and feel of their city, those of Asian/Indian ethnicity were significantly more likely to feel a sense of pride.

 

There were no significant differences in ratings of city pride between genders or households with different incomes.

All residents were also asked for the reasons that they felt/did not feel a sense of pride in the look and feel of their city.

 


Being a nice green city with beautiful parks and gardens was the top reason why residents felt a sense of pride in the look and feel of their city. Being clean/ not having litter and the atmosphere/people were also important reasons for having a sense of pride.

 


The main reasons why residents did not feel a sense of pride in the look and feel of their city were due to it looking dirty, having safety concerns and being concerned with graffiti.

It is important to note that only 9% of residents did not feel a sense of pride in the look and feel of their city. The vast majority of residents were positive about this statement.


  Page Last Updated: 24 Feb 2004
Top ^    

| Home | About the Project | Key Indicators | Definitions | Data Collection | Conclusions | Links | Contact | People |
| Knowledge and Skills | Standard of Living | Economic Development | Housing | Health | Natural Environment |
| Built Environment |Safety |Social Connectedness | Civil and Political Rights |