Home
Quality of Life in New Zealand's large urban areas.
About the Project
Quality of Life Indicators
Links
Contacts
Site Map
Section 6 - Quality of Life
   You are here:
Home
Residents' Surveys
2003 Report
People
Knowledge and Skills
Standard of Living
Economic Development
Housing
Health
Natural Environment
Built Environment
Safety
Social Connectedness
Civil and Political Rights
2001 Report
 » Advanced search
Print Key Results
Email a Friend

To view and print pdf files on this site, you will need Acrobat Reader. This is free for download from the
Adobe website.


Note: If you need to copy content from the pdfs, choose the full report or entire sections for suitable format.


Background & Research Design
Section 1: Quality of Life
Section 2: Health and Lifestyle (6 pages)
Section 3: Community Cohesion (2 pages)
Section 4: Safety
Section 5: Urban Environment (2 pages)
Section 6: Democracy (2 pages)
Section 7: Information Technology (2 pages)
Sample Sizes and Contact Analysis
Survey Questionnaire 274 KB pdf
Full Survey Report (large file) 1.2 MB pdf


Satisfaction with Decision-Making

The charts below look at resident satisfaction with the way the local Council involves the public in decision-making.




Over a third of residents were satisfied with the way their Council involves the public in the decisions it makes.

Residents of Auckland City were significantly less satisfied than residents of other cities.

 

Residents over the age of 25 were more likely to be dissatisfied with the way the Council involves the public in decision-making.

Residents of Pacific Island and Asian/Indian ethnicity were significantly more likely to be satisfied with the way the Council involves the public in decision making, while those of European and Maori ethnicity were significantly less satisfied.

 


Of all income groups, residents with a household income of less than $20,000 per year were the most likely to be satisfied with the way the Council involves the public in decision-making.

Those residents who were dissatisfied were asked their reasons why.


A lack of sufficient consultation and failure to listen to public opinion were equally the main reasons for residents’dissatisfaction with the way the Council involves the public in decision-making.


Attitudes to Council and Decision-Making

Residents of New Zealand’s eight largest cities were asked their level of agreement with the
following statements:

  • ‘The issues that the Council deals with don’t really affect you’
  • ‘Voting in Council elections gives people like you a chance to influence decisions made about your community’
  • ‘You understand how your Council makes decisions’
  • ‘You’re not very interested in what the Council does, as long as they do their job’
  • ‘You would like to have more of a say in what the Council does’
  • ‘You have confidence that the Council makes decisions that are in the best interests of the city’



The majority of residents in New Zealand’s eight largest cities felt that the issues the Council deals with affect them personally and that voting was a chance to influence decisions. Exactly half felt they understood how their Council makes decisions.

The majority of residents would like to have more of a say in what their Council does and just under half had confidence in their decisions.

These tables show the proportion of residents who agree or strongly agree with each statement about their Council and decision-making - by city, gender and ethnicity.

 
Eight Cities (n=4,000)
North Shore (n=500)
Waitak (n=500)
Auck (n=500)
Manuk (n=500)
Ham (n=500)
Wgtn (n=500)
ChCh (n=500)
Ddn (n=500)
Issues don’t affect you
27
23
31
28
31
29
21
24
26
Voting gives chance to influence decisions
67
65
68
67
64
67
65
68
70
Understand how Council makes decisions
50
50
53
45
46
53
54
53
58
Not very int erested in what Council does
42
46
46
58
48
47
37
40
41
Would like to have more of a say in what Council does
55
50
59
62
61
56
47
52
43
Have confidence that Council makes decisions in interest of City
49
45
52
39
52
48
51
55
58

Compared with all residents of New Zealand’s eight largest cities, residents of Manukau City were more likely to feel that issues don’t affect them personally, that they are not very interested in what their council does, but that they would like to have more of a say in what they do. Residents of Auckland City would also like to have more of a say in what their Council does. Residents of Christchurch and Dunedin cities on the other hand were more likely to agree that they have confidence in their Councils’ decisions. Dunedin City residents were also more likely to feel that they understand how their Council makes decisions.
 
Eight Cities (n=4,000)
Male (n=1,667)
Female (n=2,333)
European (n=2,954)
Maori (n=348)
Pacific Islands (n=206)
Asian/ Indian (n=358)
Issues don’t affect you
27
28
25
23
27
45
41
Voting gives chance to influence decisions
67
64
69
65
66
79
72
Understand how Council makes decisions
50
55
46
52
47
46
47
Not very int erested in what Council does
42
44
41
39
46
56
55
Would like to have more of a say in what Council does
55
58
53
52
64
69
63
Have confidence that Council makes decisions in interest of City
49
50
49
46
51
69
65

Residents of Pacific Island and Asian/Indian ethnicity were more likely to agree with all of the statements above, with the exception of understanding how their Council makes decisions.

Males and European residents were more likely to understand how their Council makes decisions. Males, along with Maori residents, would also like to have more of a say in what their Council does.


Influence on Decision-Making

The charts below look at how much influence residents of New Zealand’s eight largest cities feel
they have on the decisions that their Council makes.





Overall, 53% of residents felt they had some degree of influence over the decisions their Council makes.

Compared to other cities, Auckland City residents were less likely to feel they had influence over their Councils’ decisions.

 


Residents aged 18 to 25 were significantly more likely to feel they had influence over the decisions their Council makes than other age groups.

Residents of European ethnicity were less likely to feel they had influence over the decisions made by their Council. On the other hand, Pacific Island and Asian/Indian residents were significantly more likely to feel they had influence over the decisions.

 


There were no significant differences in influence between genders or households with different incomes.


Participation in Last Election




Seventy percent of residents overall claim to have voted in their last Council election.

In particular, residents of Dunedin City were significantly more likely to have voted (77%).

 


Older residents (65 and over) were far more likely to claim that they voted in their last Council election than other age groups.

Similarly, residents of European ethnicity were more likely to claim that they voted, compared with other ethnic groups.

 


There were no significant differences in frequency of voting amongst genders or household income groups.

Residents who did not vote in their last Council election were asked their reasons why.

 


The main reasons for not voting included not having enough information in order to vote, being‘too busy’ to vote, being out of the city at the time of the election and not being interested in voting.


  Page Last Updated: 24 Feb 2004
Top ^    

| Home | About the Project | Key Indicators | Definitions | Data Collection | Conclusions | Links | Contact | People |
| Knowledge and Skills | Standard of Living | Economic Development | Housing | Health | Natural Environment |
| Built Environment |Safety |Social Connectedness | Civil and Political Rights |